Home for the Weekend: Women - Mary Lynn Myers discusses the National Organization of Women

Topics | Politics | Special Collections | Women in the 1970s | Types | Interviews | Programs | Home for the Weekend | Grants | Legacy Amendment Digitization (2018-2019) | Social Issue | Second-wave Feminism |
Listen: 17183913.wav
0:00

Mary Lynn Myers, director of the South Dakota Human Rights Commission, speaks about the National Organization of Women, and her candidacy for president of organization.

Part of a Home for the Weekend program collecting shorter features that involve the subject of women.

Read the Text Transcription of the Audio.

Bargainairticket now since 1968 I joined in Chicago. When I I was there for five years between college and coming back to the South Dakota to take this job. And at that time there were just a handful of chapters 1 in Los Angeles when in Chicago and New York Washington DC and a couple of other places, we were admittedly found it on the East Coast by Betty Friedan and other people but a hundred and twenty-six of the original 300 charter members from, Wisconsin.They had a very active Commission on the status of women Tan in a women involved in Pre feminist movement kind of thing. They were tree now feminist activity. I have sweet house in South Dakota some 10 chapters and throughout the United States in every state. We have 700 chapstick total and there is a statement. We don't have our membership is heavier on the coast East and West Coast, but there certainly is it spread widely across I think the reason it appears that our emphasis Eastern intellectual is because of the media Focus out there and the fact that many of the early national leaders will fund the skeleton. Our current president is from Syracuse, New York.But first care of an outboard was from Wisconsin. Our presidents have been from California, Pennsylvania Syracuse Vernon, Connecticut, and you know. Other places so that I think it's in media image rather than and accurate description of the organ by perspective in terms of external issues and goals is really no different than the organization's basic Direction. I have certain priority said I would emphasize if I were like to present I could be canonica shoes are the most crucial swimming right now with the time and state it is with women being the first fire with the number of women hitting house Alabama poverty conditions, and those kind of dishes. I think me to beAre given greater attention in the next couple of years. So I had certain issues that our greatest concern to me that I would of course be more involved. But as far as it is to eliminate sexism in to create a world where everybody has their the ride and to use their phones Hamilton abilities regardless of their sex with a race or religion or whatever and that doesn't change from Canada to candidate. The media focus is what I think has made the difference in terms of your people stand in now the other than there being any real difference is the composition of now like in in South Dakota largely rural State, I should think your chapters would be different in many ways from the chapters and in the more urban parts of the country.I would say the greatest distinction between chapters is between the large Urban Central City Campus and small world. Basically, you know, they're there is perhaps a different style more than a difference of gold since I've been a member of both Chicago chapter, which has a large Central City or 500 members and a member of Pierre Central South Dakota now which has 30 members in a very small town and we're all working on the same time, but I'm in Chicago when I was there it was quite common to have rallies demonstrations tickets. I'll get a lot of media attention.We had a more direct action focus. It was the style of the community more than anything. I am the tolerance level for rather diversion tactics, and I would think Chicago ticket is nothing unusual. I haven't talked to try and tear a picket is considered revolutionary. There's been one demonstration at the Capitol by Amos. I recall and Piers entire history.The one demonstration that we had here on the women's movement wasn't the demonstration at all week and a commemoration of August 26th and the capitol steps and the excerpt how to separate speeches from 100 years ago. The governor sent his staff assistant what kind of strategy for work in the various communities different kinds of strategies different kind of image is necessary in a town like tear it up. You know, what are the steps of the post office in Chicago so I can get a wider than beingDifferent issues that were working on because they working on equal employment opportunity to test it was originally drafted the amendments to our right by where we can we dress cuz I know they were sent here and the Doug hamster at Stateline very hard for those changes. And so, you know, when we when we here it says it's at the Cody is a provincial Conservative whatever Backwards Day and simply not true because we have a 1973 with practically no trouble at all. And I would say, you know in terms of our where our heads are we are not still a different. We may even be a hit.But our tactics are somewhat different because you know, it seems to me there's always been a progressive streak among the farmers in this country. And I wonder if that affects politics and South Dakota has made your work a little easier in some respect. Because I work in the movement end in the Civil Rights Movement to know anything about South Dakota and I thought to myself several times. What is it that makes South Dakota to Paradox & Minifigs around us are the same way that people think we are a reaction rate and I'm not willing to make changes, and yet we do cancel my most aggressive Heritage people who established the First Citizens and Anthony Wayne Lee independent hard-working. I have a hardship. If you've ever read any of the stories of the early Pioneer Women, you know, it's amazing what they went through and they are not the sort of people today. I think it is anything women in this state share a greater role in decision-making in the Indian culture itself is extremely call Darian particularly, and all of that. I think has played a part in making people. Not labeled and they're thinking and willing to be open-minded and you know, if you look at Princess the composition of our legislature, we have more women serving and then they doing some of the so-called Progressive States. We've had women constitutional officers for years, but then we got that everyone else to get the credit for these major breakthroughs in South Dakota discovered years back, but we're not we're not eager to jump into the national. I might I think maybe people are afraid he may find out what house what it is. Where are the best spots in the United States more comprehensive? It has included in every section of the law in which is not true enough to take a look at the combination of those Thanksgiving South Dakota is really in a lot of issues. But we are you should become president. Will you leave South Dakota right out of my home? I already have enough said the president of now traditionally is president from where she lived from time to time, but I would never the right hand care and Danforth as my home.

Transcripts

text | pdf |

SPEAKER 1: I've been active in NOW since 1968. I joined in Chicago when I would live there for five years, between college and coming back to South Dakota to take this job. And at that time, there were just a handful of chapters, one in Los Angeles, one in Chicago, one in New York, Washington DC, and a couple of other places.

We were admittedly founded on the East Coast by Betty Friedan and other people. But 126 of the original 300 charter members were from Wisconsin, where they had a very active Commission on the Status of Women and many women involved in pre-feminist movement kinds of things, in other words, pre-NOW feminist activities.

We have, in South Dakota, some 10 chapters. And throughout the United States, in every state, we have 700 chapters total. And there isn't a state in which we don't have a chapter. Our membership is heavier on the coasts, East and West Coast. But there certainly is, it's spread widely across the country. I think the reason it appears that our emphasis is Eastern intellectual is because of the media focus out there and the fact that many of our early national leaders were from the East Coast. And our current president is from Syracuse, New York.

So that the national media attention has been focused on East Coast leaders. But the first chair of NOW's board was from Wisconsin. Our presidents have been from California, Pennsylvania, Syracuse, Vernon, Connecticut, and various other places. So that I think it's a media image rather than an accurate description of the organization.

My perspective in terms of external issues and goals is really no different than the organization's basic direction. I have certain priorities that I would emphasize if I were elected president. I think the economic issues are the most crucial to women right now, with the economy in the state it is, with women being the first fired since they're the last hired, with the number of women heading households and the poverty conditions that women live in.

And those kinds of issues, I think, need to be given greater attention in the next couple of years. So I have certain issues that are of greatest concern to me that I would, of course, be more involved in than perhaps some of the other candidates who are more concerned about some other things.

But as far as all of us, in terms of our goals ultimately, it is to eliminate sexism and to create a humanist world where everybody has the right and the opportunity to use their full talents and abilities, regardless of their sex, or their race, or their religion, or whatever. And that doesn't change from candidate to candidate. The media focus is what I think has made the difference in terms of where people stand in now, rather than there being any real difference.

SPEAKER 2: Well, what is the composition of NOW like in South Dakota, a largely rural state? I should think your chapters would be different in many ways from the chapters in the more urban parts of the country.

SPEAKER 1: Certainly. I would say the greatest distinction between chapters is between the large urban central city chapters and small rural town chapters. Basically, there is perhaps a difference of style more than a difference of goals. Since I've been a member of both the Chicago chapter, which is a large central city urban chapter, 500 members, and a member of Pierre, Central South Dakota NOW, which has 30 members in a very small town. And we're all working on the same kinds of issues.

But in Chicago, when I was there, it was quite common to have rallies, demonstrations, pickets. We got a lot of media attention. We had a more direct action focus. It was the style of the community more than anything and the tolerance level for rather divergent tactics-- in other words, in Chicago, a picket is nothing unusual, happens all the time. In Pierre, a picket is considered revolutionary.

SPEAKER 2: There's been one demonstration at the Capitol, by AIM, as I recall, in Pierre's entire history.

SPEAKER 1: And the one demonstration that we had here on the women's movement wasn't a demonstration at all. We had a commemoration of August 26 on the Capitol steps. And there were excerpts out of suffrage speeches from 100 years ago read. The governor sent his staff assistant. It was all very dignified and everything. And I think more, it's a difference in what kinds of strategies will work in the various communities.

Different kind of strategies, different kind of image is necessary in a town like here, as compared to a town like Chicago, where if you had excerpts from suffrage speeches on the steps of the post office in Chicago, no one would pay the least bit of attention. Out here, they will.

So I think rather than being different issues that we're working on-- because in Chicago they're working on equal employment opportunity, child care, rape, and so forth. Out here, we just got, in the last session of the legislature, the best rape law in the country passed. It was originally drafted, the amendments to our rape law were originally drafted by NOW members in Pierre. And the NOW chapters throughout the state lobbied very hard for those changes.

And so when we hear it said that South Dakota is a provincial, conservative, whatever, backward state, it's simply not true because we have achieved, we got the ERA ratified here in 1973 with practically no trouble at all. Whereas in some of the more so-called liberal progressive states, they're still struggling to get it ratified. And I would say in terms of where our heads are, we are not so different. We may even be ahead of some of the more progressive in people's minds. But our tactics are somewhat different because different things work.

SPEAKER 2: Well, there have always been, it seems to me, there's always been a progressive streak among the farmers in this country. And I wonder if that affects politics in South Dakota and has made your work a little easier in some respects.

SPEAKER 1: I certainly think that's part of it. And I also think-- I thought a lot about it because in my work in the movement and in the Civil Rights movement too, people often say, how do you stand living out there in that backward, conservative state? And I say, now, wait a minute, you don't know anything about South Dakota.

And I've thought to myself several times, what is it that makes South Dakota such a paradox? And many states around us are the same way, that people think we are reactionary even and not willing to make changes. And yet we do have some of the most progressive stands on things.

And I think part of it is our pioneer heritage. People who established this state and who were its first citizens and most who set the tone of what was going to happen in South Dakota were extremely independent, hardworking, stubborn even, people, hardy stock, who came out here and endured incredible hardship. If you've ever read any of the stories of the early pioneer women, it's amazing what they went through. And they are not the sort of people to be dictated to as to what they're going to think.

If anything, women in this state share a greater role in decision making. And the Indian culture itself is extremely equalitarian, the Sioux culture particularly. And all of that, I think, has played a part in making people not labeled in their thinking and willing to be open minded.

And if you look at, for instance, the composition of our legislature, we have more women serving in our legislature here than they do in some of the so-called progressive states. We've had women constitutional officers for years. Whereas in places like California, they finally got their first last election. And it was this major breakthrough. And I said, what's so new about that? We have three women constitutional officers in South Dakota.

And so I think we perhaps tend to hide our light under a bushel. It's irritating to me for everyone else to get the credit for these major breakthroughs that South Dakota discovered years back. But we're not, we're not eager to jump into the national limelight. I think maybe people are afraid here if everybody finds out how good it is in South Dakota, that we'll have an influx of people. And the good things are here. So we tend not to advertise widely what benefits we have.

We have one of the best human rights laws in the United States. It's more comprehensive. Sex is included in every section of the law, which is not true in most states. And so you look at the combination of those things and you see that South Dakota is really years ahead in a lot of issues. But we are thought to be years behind.

SPEAKER 2: If you should become president, will you leave South Dakota?

SPEAKER 1: Oh, no. I'll work right out of my home. I already have an office set up in my dining room. The president of NOW traditionally is president from wherever she lives. Our national office is in Chicago. And I would, of course, need to spend a good deal of time there from time to time. But I would live right here in Pierre and work out of my home.

Funders

Digitization made possible by the State of Minnesota Legacy Amendment’s Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund, approved by voters in 2008.

This Story Appears in the Following Collections

Views and opinions expressed in the content do not represent the opinions of APMG. APMG is not responsible for objectionable content and language represented on the site. Please use the "Contact Us" button if you'd like to report a piece of content. Thank you.

Transcriptions provided are machine generated, and while APMG makes the best effort for accuracy, mistakes will happen. Please excuse these errors and use the "Contact Us" button if you'd like to report an error. Thank you.

< path d="M23.5-64c0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.2 -0.1 0.1-0.1 0.1-0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.1-0.1 0.3-0.1 0.4 -0.2 0.1 0 0.2 0 0.3 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.2 0 0.4-0.1 0.5-0.1 0.2 0 0.4 0 0.6-0.1 0.2-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.5 0.1-0.1 0.3 0 0.4-0.1 0.2-0.1 0.3-0.3 0.4-0.5 0-0.1 0-0.1 0-0.2 0-0.1 0.1-0.2 0.1-0.3 0-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.2 0-0.1 0-0.2 0-0.3 0-0.2 0-0.4-0.1-0.5 -0.4-0.7-1.2-0.9-2-0.8 -0.2 0-0.3 0.1-0.4 0.2 -0.2 0.1-0.1 0.2-0.3 0.2 -0.1 0-0.2 0.1-0.2 0.2C23.5-64 23.5-64.1 23.5-64 23.5-64 23.5-64 23.5-64"/>